Current Lack of Evidence on Treatment Strategies and Clinical Outcomes for Osteochondral Lesions of the Subtalar, Talonavicular, and Calcaneocuboid Joints: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: In contrast to osteochondral lesion (OCL) of the ankle, OCLs in other joints of the foot, such as subtalar joint, talonavicular joint, calcaneocuboid joint, and the midfoot, are rare conditions, but they can also lead to significant morbidity. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical evidence for the treatment of OCLs of the subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, and the other midfoot joints. DESIGN: A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in January 2021 based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines by 2 independent reviewers. Included studies were evaluated with regard to LOE (level of evidence) and QOE (quality of evidence). Variable reporting outcome data, clinical outcomes, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen studies with 21 patients were included, all of which were case reports (level 5) without any case series reporting greater than 3 patients. There were 5 patients with OCL in the subtalar joint, 15 patients in the talonavicular joint, and 1 patient in the calcaneocuboid joint. Thirteen case reports (4 subtalar joint, 8 talonavicular joint, and 1 calcaneocuboid joint) reported surgical treatment. Surgical procedures mainly included debridement, bone marrow stimulation, fixation, and bone grafting, through open or arthroscopy, all of which resulted in successful outcomes. Four case reports (1 subtalar joint, 3 talonavicular joint) reported successful conservative treatment. Other 13 case reports reported successful surgery after failed conservative treatment. No complications and reoperations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The current systematic review revealed that there is no available evidence to ascertain clinical outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments for cartilage lesions in the talonavicular joint, subtalar joint, and the midfoot joints, owing to the extreme paucity of literature. Both nonoperative and operative treatments can be considered, but no treatment strategies have been established.

Outcomes of Selective Arthrodesis Based on Joints Affected in 33 Feet With Müller-Weiss Disease.

No consensus exists regarding operative treatment of Müller-Weiss disease (MWD). Its only classification is based solely on Méary's angle and serves neither as guide to management nor prognosis. We report on 33 feet that underwent surgery following failed conservative management. Treatment was directed towards joint(s) involved, as determined by clinical examination, plain radiography and SPECT-CT. Thus, surgery consisted of isolated talonavicular in 6 feet, triple in 8, subtalar and talonavicular in 7, talonaviculocuneiform in 4, talonaviculocuneiform with interpositional tricortical iliac crest graft in 6 and pantalar arthrodesis in 2. PROMIS scores for pain interference and depression decreased significantly (p < .001) with significant accompanying increase in physical function (p = .003). Union occurred in 31 of 33 feet (94%) with complete resolution of pain at an average follow-up of 84 months. Of the 2 nonunions, 1 had fracture through the lateral navicular, and the other marked sclerosis and avascularity of the lateral navicular. We describe our pathways for selecting arthrodesis based on the joints affected. Isolated talonavicular arthrodesis was performed in early stages of MWD, which begins at the talonavicular articulation. When disease extended to both sides of the navicular, we performed talonaviculocuneiform arthrodesis. When considering isolated talonavicular, double medial or triple arthrodesis, there should be adequate cancellous bone stock remaining in the lateral part of the navicular, as determined on medial oblique radiographs and CT scan. In case of inadequate bone stock or fracture through the lateral navicular, talonaviculocuneiform arthrodesis with interpositional iliac crest bone graft is recommended.

Talonavicular arthrodesis: Does the IOFiX system provide safe and reliable fixation?

AIMS: Talonavicular (TN) arthrodesis is a common procedure to treat arthritis of the TN joint.It can also form part of a wider triple fusion to restore the architecture of the foot.Traditional methods of arthrodesis are not universally successful. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of those who had a TN fusion using the IOFiX system. Data was collected retrospectively from the hospital operation database. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a TN fusion between 2012 and 19 with the IOFiX system. All patients were over 16 years of age and at least one year post operation.Patient demographics were obtained, as well as rate of union and rate of re-operation for analysis. RESULTS: 35 patients were identified. The mean age was 58 years (range 34-85). The most common indication was osteoarthritis of the TN joint (n = 19), followed by acquired adult flat foot (n = 8), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3), avascular necrosis (n = 2) and a previous nonunion.(n = 1). 9 % (n = 3) of patients did not achieve union by one year and 14 % (n = 5) required another operation subsequent to their initial surgery: four to remove metalwork, and one to treat non-union of the arthrodesis. The use of bone graft did not affect complication rates. TN fusion, when performed as part of a triple fusion, showed a tendency for reducing the rate of non-union, however this did not achieve statical significance. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the IOFiX system offers a reliable and acceptable alternative technique for patients undergoing a TN fusion. Further work is required to assess if early signs of improved outcome when used in triple fusion, over isolated TN fusion,are significant.

Anatomic Description of the Calcaneocuboid Joint: Implications for Staple Fixation.

Understanding the anatomy of the calcaneocuboid (CCJ) remains essential when selecting staple fixation to optimize osseous purchase during rearfoot procedures. This anatomic study quantitatively describes the CCJ in relation to staple fixation sites. The calcaneus and cuboid from 10 cadavers were dissected. Widths at 5 mm and 10 mm increments away from the joint were measured in dorsal, midline, and plantar thirds of each bone. The widths between each position's 5 mm and 10 mm increments were compared using the Student's t test. The widths among the positions at both distances were compared using an ANOVA then post hoc testing. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The middle (23 ± 3 mm) and plantar third (18 ± 3 mm) of the calcaneus at the 10 mm interval was greater than the 5 mm interval (p = .04). At 5 mm distal to the CCJ, the dorsal third of the cuboid maintained a statistically significant greater width than the plantar third (p = .02). The 5 mm (p = .001) and 10 mm (p = .005) dorsal calcaneus widths as well as the 5 mm (p = .003) and 10 mm (p = .007) middle calcaneus widths were significantly greater than the plantar widths. This investigation supports the use of 20 mm staple 10 mm away from the CCJ in dorsal and midline orientations. Care should be taken when placing a plantar staple within 10 mm proximal to the CCJ as the legs may extend beyond the medial cortex compared to dorsal and midline placements.

Double versus Triple Arthrodesis for Flatfoot Deformity: When, Why, and How?

Different types of arthrodesis for flatfoot deformity have a long history in foot and ankle surgery. Arthrodesis of the rearfoot can be a useful tool in helping correct deformity and maintaining that correction with good long-term results. Questions have risen recently however about the necessity of including the calcaneocuboid joint in the traditional rearfoot arthrodesis or triple arthrodesis. The double arthrodesis of the talonavicular and subtalar joints has grown in popularity and this review helps the reader choose with a review of the biomechanics, surgical approaches, fixation techniques and recent literature outcomes of both procedures.

Intraoperative Technical Tips to Improve Fusion Between the First and Second Metatarsals in the Original Lapidus Procedure.

The modified Lapidus procedure (MLP), which consists of fusion between the first metatarsal (M1) and medial cuneiform, has been widely performed with satisfactory clinical outcomes, but it has a variable nonunion rate ranging between 4% and 10% and loss of correction in up to 5.8% of the cases. Excessive motion around the site of tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, specially at the intercuneiform joint, is probably the reason. The original Lapidus procedure (OLP), which includes fusion of the M1 to second metatarsal (M2), may be beneficial in preventing nonunion and recurrence. The objective of this study was to describe intraoperative technical tips in the OLP to improve M1 to M2 fusion, which may prevent complications. Since the Lapidus procedure continues to gain popularity, it is the authors opinion that the OLP requires special attention because it is a more technically demanding surgery compared to the MLP.Level of Evidence: Level V: Expert opinion.

Chopart Joint Injuries: Assessment, Treatment, and 10-Year Results.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate injury patterns and long-term outcomes of midtarsal (Chopart) injuries in a sizeable number of patients. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-two patients (average age 37.6 years) with 128 Chopart injuries over a 15-year period, 27% of who were polytraumatized. In 47%, more than 1 of the 4 bones of the midtarsal joint was fractured. The navicular and cuboid were fractured most often. Purely ligamentous dislocations occurred in 4%. INTERVENTIONS: Operative treatment tailored to the individual fracture pattern was performed in 91.4%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Foot Function Index, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score, SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with 75 Chopart injuries were available for follow-up at an average of 10.1 years. The Foot Function Index averaged 26.9, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score averaged 71.5, and the SF-36 PCS and MCS averaged 43.5 and 51.2, respectively. Negative prognostic factors were a high injury severity score, work-related accidents, open and multiple fractures, purely ligamentous dislocations, staged surgery, delay of treatment >4 weeks, postoperative infection, and primary or secondary fusion. Open reduction and internal fixation led to significantly better results than attempted closed reduction and percutaneous fixation. Radiographic signs of posttraumatic arthritis were observed in 93%, but only 4.7% of cases required a late fusion at the Chopart joint. CONCLUSIONS: Chopart joint injuries lead to functional restrictions in the long term. Purely ligamentous dislocations have the worst prognosis, whereas fractures of a single bone have a favorable outcome after anatomic reduction and internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Double and Triple Tarsal Fusions in the Severe Rigid Flatfoot Deformity.

A flatfoot deformity is a multiplanar foot deformity characterized by forefoot abduction and supination and hindfoot valgus. With progressive pathology, a rigid deformity may develop. In the setting of a rigid deformity, the appropriate procedure to use is not without controversy. The extent of joints to involve in the arthrodesis depends on the ability to obtain a plantigrade foot. Both double and triple arthrodesis have been suggested. Care must be taken to avoid lateral column shortening and loss of foot reduction when fusing the CC joint. The concerns about lateral skin breakdown led some surgeons to describe a single medial incision for a triple or modified double arthrodesis. The necessity of bone grafting has been controversial. Implant selection is essential to achieve solid stabilization of the arthrodesis sites. To decrease the risk of overcorrection and malunion, the surgeon should be familiar with the hindfoot biomechanics and generate, based on the clinical examination and imaging, a meticulous preoperative plan to address and balance both the soft tissue and bony deformity.

Pantalar Arthrodesis.

A triple arthrodesis is comprised of subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints arthrodesis. A pantalar arthrodesis is triple arthrodesis combined with tibiotalar arthrodesis. The goal of the procedure is to obtain a correction of deformity and achieve a plantigrade, functional, painless, stable, weightbearing foot that can be used to ambulate. This is done by creating an osseous continuity across the ankle, subtalar, and talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints. There are several approaches and fixation strategies that result in successful clinical union and should be chosen to match the clinical situation. Modern techniques result in high rates of union and pain relief.

Delayed Treatment of a Medial Swivel Talonavicular Dislocation.

This case describes delayed treatment of a medial talonavicular dislocation with a shear fracture of the talar head, a comminuted posterior talar process fracture, and an intra-articular cuboid fracture with subtle medial displacement of the calcaneocuboid joint and the associated treatment. The injury was sustained in a 35-year-old man following a high-energy motor vehicle accident. Three weeks following the injury, delayed treatment was achieved following an attempted closed reduction under general anesthesia followed by open reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation. After a 12-month follow-up, the patient was able to return to work and regular activities pain-free without complications. Several associated injuries have been described with isolated talonavicular dislocations. This case reviews the technique and care surrounding this injury pattern and its delayed treatment.

Persistent Pain After Hindfoot Fusion.

One of the most challenging problems facing orthopedic surgeons is persistent pain after surgery and certainly is just as frustrating following hindfoot fusion. The hindfoot joints consist of the subtalar, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid (CC) joints. These joints are commonly fused for degenerative changes, deformity correction, inflammatory or neuropathic arthropathy, tarsal coalition, or primarily after trauma. Goals of hindfoot fusion are a painless plantigrade foot capable of fitting in shoes without orthotics or a brace. Many believe that deformity correction is achievable without inclusion of the CC joint. Managing patient expectations is important when counseling a patient especially regarding potential complications.

Long-term Outcomes of Talonavicular Arthrodesis for the Treatment of Planovalgus Foot in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Planovalgus foot (PVF) in cerebral palsy (CP) tends toward progression and rigidity in adolescence, especially in patients with greater functional impairment. Deformity at the talonavicular joint justifies the use of talonavicular arthrodesis as a corrective surgical technique. This study aims to assess patient or caregiver functional satisfaction and radiographic outcomes of talonavicular arthrodesis for PVF in CP patients with assisted ambulation in the long-term. METHODS: Retrospective comparative study of level III and level IV pediatric CP patients who underwent talonavicular arthrodesis for PVF between 1999 and 2010 as part of multilevel surgery and with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Radiologic correction at 10 years was compared with preintervention values, and functional impact at 10 years was measured by the foot function index (FFI); correlation between radiologic measurements and FFI were obtained, and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-nine PVFs in 25 patients with CP (72% level III and 28% level IV) were included; 52% were male. The patients had a median age of 12 years at the time of surgery (range: 11 to 15) and 23 years at the time of the study (21 to 26). Significant (P<0.01) pre-post radiologic improvements were obtained in Meary angle (37.86±10.7/8.37±5.5 degrees), calcaneal pitch (3.20±8.1/13.22±5.6 degrees), lateral talocalcaneus angle (42.18±12.1/25.29±2.9 degrees), Moreau-Costa-Bartani angle (167.04±8/146.12±7.1 degrees), talus-first metatarsal angle (27.92±13.9/9.69±4.4 degrees), anteroposterior talocalcaneal angle (37.61±7.4/22.61±2.4 degrees), and talus coverage angle (37.04±11.11/2.45±2.5 degrees). At 10 years postoperatively, functional outcome measured with the FFI was satisfactory (33.9±15.2%) and the mean maximum pain was 3.04; 56% of cases had mild pain. All patients were able to wear an ankle-foot orthosis and 8 no longer needed the device. A significant correlation was found between the talofirst metatarsal angle and the FFI (P=0.024). There were 8% of cases with screw protrusion and 14% presented pseudarthrosis, most of them asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: The adequate functional outcome, as well as the persistence of long-term radiologic correction and acceptable number of complications, enables us to recommend talonavicular arthrodesis as an alternative treatment to consider in level III and level IV CP patients with PVF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Double Versus Triple Arthrodesis Fusion Rates: A Systematic Review.

Hindfoot arthrodesis is often required for end-staged deformities, such as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Although the need for hindfoot arthrodesis is generally accepted in severe deformities, there is a debate whether a double or triple arthrodesis should be performed. The aim of our systematic review is to review the fusion rates and mean time to fusion in double and triple arthrodesis. A total of 184 articles were identified using the keyword search through the database of articles published from 2005 to 2017. After review by 3 physicians, a total of 13 articles met the eligibility criteria. The reason for double or triple arthrodesis within the studies were posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, tarsal coalition, degenerative joint disease, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Charcot Marie Tooth, Multiple Sclerosis, Polio, neuromuscular disorder, cerebral palsy, acrodystrophic neuropathy, clubfoot, post-traumatic, and seronegative arthropathy (spondyloarthritis). Within these 13 studies, there were a total of 343 (6-95) subjects extremities operated on. The overall fusion rate for double arthrodesis was 91.75% (289/315) compared to 92.86% (26/28) triple arthrodesis fusion rate, p value .8370. The mean time to fusion for double arthrodesis was 17.96 ± 7.96 weeks compared to 16.70 ± 8.18 weeks for triple arthrodesis, p value = .8133. There are risks associated with triple arthrodesis including increased surgical times, lateral wound complications, residual deformity, surgical costs and peri-articular arthritis. Given the benefits of double arthrodesis over triple arthrodesis and the nearly equivalent fusion rates and time to fusion, double arthrodesis is an effective alternative to triple arthrodesis. The authors of this systematic review recommend double arthrodesis as the hindfoot fusion procedure of choice.

Coronal Hindfoot Alignment in Midfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy.

Coronal plane hindfoot malalignment produces abnormal compensatory forces within the midfoot and forefoot. The primary aim of this study is to compare radiographic hindfoot alignment in patients with a midfoot Charcot event, and identify patterns associated with breakdown. A retrospective review of 43 patients (48 limbs) with midfoot Charcot neuroarthropathy were compared between the coronal hindfoot alignments and Charcot joint involvement. Coronal hindfoot alignment was classified as neutral (n = 15), valgus (n = 16), and varus (n = 17) utilizing the Saltzman hindfoot alignment radiograph. Charcot joint breakdown was classified as isolated tarsometatarsal joint (n = 8), combination of tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints (n = 22), and midtarsal joints including talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints (n = 18). Patients exhibiting varus hindfoot alignment had 5.8 times greater risk of breakdown at the tarsometatarsal and naviculocuneiform joints (odds ratio 5.8, 95% confidence interval 1.7-22.9, p < .01). Hindfoot varus induces external rotation of the talus, resulting in compensation through the naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joint, which correlates with our findings of a 6-fold increase in naviculocuneiform and tarsometatarsal joint collapse. Patients exhibiting valgus hindfoot alignment had 27 times greater risk of breakdown at the midtarsal joint (odds ratio 27.0; 95% confidence interval 5.6-207.0, p < .01). Hindfoot valgus induces internal rotation of the talonavicular joint, which correlates with our findings of a 27-fold increase in midtarsal joint breakdown. Varus and valgus hindfoot alignment are associated with different midfoot injury patterns, which may have implications in surgical management and allow for focused surveillance in neuropathic patients presenting with early-stage clinical findings consistent with Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Radiographic Outcomes of Talonavicular Joint Arthrodesis With Varying Fixation Techniques in Stage III Adult Acquired Flatfoot Reconstruction.

Utilization of the talonavicular joint (TN) arthrodesis as an isolated procedure or in combination with hindfoot arthrodesis has been described in the literature for treatment of numerous hindfoot conditions. When used in isolation or with concomitant hindfoot arthrodesis, the TN joint has demonstrated nonunion rates reported as high as 37% in the literature. Despite previous research, there remains a lack of agreement upon the ideal fixation technique for TN joint arthrodesis with and without concomitant subtalar joint arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the radiographic and clinical results of TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs in the treatment of advanced hindfoot malalignment in stage III adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. We retrospectively reviewed 105 patients who underwent TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure utilizing 4 separate fixation constructs. Our results demonstrated a nonunion rate of 16.2%, with 17 nonunions identified within our patient population. One (2.4%) nonunion was observed in the 3-screw cohort, 7 (33.3%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw cohort, 4 (16.0%) nonunions were observed in the 2-screw plus plate cohort, and 5 (29.4%) nonunions were observed in the 1-screw plus plate cohort. The difference in nonunion rate between the 4 cohorts was statistically significant. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of a 3-screw construct for TN joint arthrodesis as part of double arthrodesis procedure demonstrates a statistically significant reduction in nonunion rate and should be considered a superior fixation construct for this procedure.

Which surgical approach is optimal for joint preparation in talonavicular fusion - A cadaver study.

BACKGROUND: Fusion of the talonavicular joint has proven challenging in literature. The optimal surgical approach for talonavicular arthrodesis is still uncertain. This study compares the amount of physical joint preparation between dorsal and medial approaches to the talonavicular joint. METHODS: Twenty fresh frozen cadaver specimens were randomly assigned to receive either a dorsal or medial operative approach to the talonavicular joint. The joint surface was prepared, and the joint was disarticulated. Image analysis, using ImageJ, was performed by two blinded reviewers to assess the joint surface preparation and this was compared by surgical approach. RESULTS: The dorsal approach had a higher median percentage of talar and total talonavicular joint surface area prepared (75% vs. 59% (p = .007) and 82% vs. 70% (p = .005)). Irrespective of approach, the talus was significantly more difficult to prepare than the navicular (62% vs 88% (p = .001)). CONCLUSION: The dorsal approach provides superior talonavicular joint preparation. The lateral »th of the talar head was the most difficult surface to prepare, and surgeons performing double or triple arthrodesis may prepare the lateral talar head from the lateral approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Bilateral dorsal rotation of the talus with tibiotarsal, talocalcaneal, and proximal intertarsal joint subluxation in an alpaca.

CASE DESCRIPTION: A 14-month-old female alpaca presented with a 3-week history of acute left hind limb lameness and swelling of the left tarsal region. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Radiography revealed intermittent dorsal rotation of the talus with tibiotarsal, talocalcaneal, and proximal intertarsal joint subluxation. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: In an attempt to stabilize the talus, screws were placed in the distomedial aspect of the talus and the plantaromedial aspect of the central tarsal bone, and a stainless-steel wire was placed around the screws in a figure-eight pattern. The screw head of the proximal screw broke within 4 weeks after surgery, but subluxation did not recur, and the lameness resolved. Seven months later, the same condition was diagnosed in the opposite hind limb and was treated similarly. Implants remained intact on this side, but the animal started to show signs of pain and inability to flex the tarsal joint, prompting removal of the distal screw. Subsequently, the animal became sound and produced 2 healthy crias, but was euthanatized 4 years after the second surgery because of coccidiosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dorsal rotation of the talus with tibiotarsal, talocalcaneal, and proximal intertarsal joint subluxation is a sporadic condition in New World camelids. This report provides the first account of successful treatment by surgical stabilization of the medial aspect of the proximal intertarsal joint.

Load to Failure of the Ankle Joint Complex After Fusion of the Subtalar and Talonavicular Joints: A Cadaveric Study.

Recent literature has proposed that restriction of joints in the rearfoot secondary to coalitions may lead to increased risk for severe ankle fracture after trauma. There is a paucity of literature regarding the rigidity of the ankle joint after arthrodesis of the subtalar and talonavicular joints. In this study, load-to-failure testing of cadaveric ankle joints with and without fusion of the subtalar and talonavicular joints was performed to determine if clinically relevant fracture patterns could be reproduced. Of the 3 fixation patterns studied, combined subtalar and talonavicular joint fusion resulted in a measurable increase in joint stiffness; however, this was not statistically significant. Clinical and radiographic examination postloading revealed that all tested ankle joints sustained a dislocation type injury rather than a specific bone fracture pattern. It was determined that a pure low-speed bending and compression model does not produce clinically relevant fracture patterns, and that higher energy mechanisms are required.

Severe Talonavicular Osteoarthritis After a Neglected Navicular Stress Fracture: A Case Report.

CASE: A 17-year-old high school rugby player complained of right midfoot pain for 18 months. Radiographs showed severe osteoarthritic changes in the right talonavicular joint. A navicular fracture, talonavicular joint narrowing, a talar head cyst, and proximal navicular fragmentation were detected on computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent removal of the osteochondral fragments and fracture reduction and returned to rugby 8 months postoperatively. CT showed a remodeling of the talonavicular joint 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In a young athlete, reconstruction of the talonavicular joint should be attempted before joint fusion, even if the joint shows signs of secondary osteoarthritis.

Principles of Triple Arthrodesis and Limited Arthrodesis in the Cavus Foot.

Cavus foot is a complex podiatric deformity that requires precise and in-depth work-up through an objective, physical, and radiographic examination. The goal of surgical treatment is to eliminate pain while establishing a plantigrade foot structure. Triple arthrodesis has proven to be an effective surgical procedure for treatment of moderate to severe rearfoot deformity with or without the presence of rearfoot arthritic changes. The foot and ankle surgeon must always be aware that no two cavus deformity cases are alike, therefore one may require additional surgical procedures including soft tissue balancing, joint-sparing osteotomies, and/or supplementary arthrodesing procedures.